Will ChatGPT subvert the intellectual property industry?
【附谷歌英文翻译With Google English Translation】
第一、是已经有人讨论过的使用ChatGPT写专利的场景。我个人认为，ChatGPT肯定可以用于写专利，但是，如果借用现在的高价值专利这一热词，作者持高度怀疑和谨慎观点。对于写专利，将ChatGPT视为现有的“编专利软件或平台”的高级升级版，并无不妥，因为真正的高价值专利，需要考虑的前台后台因素实在是太多，而且很多是不确定、甚至是未知的！（The name of the game is Claim.）
作者认为，如果现有的专利制度框架不做出重大乃至本质性改变，那么ChatGPT完全有颠覆或覆灭专利行业的可能，怎么做到？其实很简单，就是让世界上不存在符合专利授权条件的发明创造 - 由于新颖性、创造性问题，导致无法被授权。
试想一下，ChatGPT是可以永不停歇的、持续产出覆盖任何技术领域的现有技术（Prior Arts）的，如果这些现有技术都成为公众可以获悉的（Publicly Available），那么还有哪个发明创造可以获得授权呢？
Google English Translation
The so-called artificial intelligence and AI have caused people's "concern and exclamation" more than once or twice, but so far, I am afraid that they cannot be compared with the discussions triggered by ChatGPT.
So, what impact will ChatGPT, or the AI technology and industry represented by ChatGPT, have on the intellectual property (patent) industry? (The following will only use ChatGPT for reference)
The following are the author's two opinions on whether ChatGPT will subvert the intellectual property (patent) industry (as one of the ChatGPT quick reviews that the author plans to launch one after another):
1. Will ChatGPT subvert the intellectual property industry?
ChatGTP can empower certain scenarios in the intellectual property industry. As for how powerful the empowerment is, it depends on how smart ChatGPT’s technology is, and in what scenarios and how the applicators train ChatGPT.
To give a few examples of patent areas :
The first is the scenario of using ChatGPT to write patents that has already been discussed . I personally think that ChatGPT can definitely be used to write patents. However, if we borrow the current hot word of high-value patents, the author is highly skeptical and cautious. For writing patents, it is not wrong to regard ChatGPT as an advanced upgraded version of the existing "patent editing software or platform", because there are too many front and back factors to consider for real high-value patents, and many of them are uncertain , or even unknown! (The name of the game is Claim.)
Second, ChatGPT can help patent mining . Compared with many search and interaction algorithms and technologies, ChatGPT must have a great improvement at the technical level. This, in the final analysis, is actually the ability to search and digest information (existing technology). This ability is important for patents (innovation points ) ) digging obviously has the most immediate help. Also, if we expand this a little bit, we can see what ChatGPT can do for technology development.
Third, if one can understand the application of ChatGPT in the field of patent mining, then, for patent practitioners, the application of ChatGPT in the field of patent dispute handling (especially patent invalidation ) should come naturally.
Fourth, continuing to extend the relevance, ChatGPT should be able to play a role in the field of patent rights protection, such as discovering infringements.
Fifth, other application scenarios that are essentially patent information/intelligence utilization, such as patent analysis, navigation, review, FTO, etc., ChatGPT can provide useful help from the perspective of efficiency improvement and cost savings.
To sum up, the author believes that in the field of patent writing, we should not rely too much on ChatGPT to provide empowerment. In the fields of patent mining, patent invalidation and discovery of infringement , ChatGPT should be able to provide a relatively large increase in empowerment. In patent analysis, In areas such as navigation, review, FTO and equivalent value evaluation, transaction design and negotiation , ChatGPT should be able to provide useful help from the perspective of efficiency improvement and cost saving, but depending on the specific demand scenario, you should not rely too much on the output of ChatGPT.
If the following things do not happen, the author believes that ChatGPT will not subvert (destroy) the intellectual property (patent) industry!
2. ChatGPT can subvert the intellectual property (patent) industry!
The controversy over whether AI can be used as an inventor, which has lasted for two or three years, obviously only limits people's imagination. AI's challenge to the patent industry is only limited within the framework of the existing patent system. A small scope of how to be identified (whether AI can be an inventor, nothing more).
The author believes that if the existing patent system framework does not make major or even substantive changes, then ChatGPT has the possibility of subverting or destroying the patent industry. How to do it? In fact, it is very simple, that is, there are no inventions and creations that meet the conditions for patent authorization in the world - due to novelty and creativity problems, they cannot be authorized.
Just imagine, ChatGPT can never stop and continuously produce existing technologies ( Prior Arts ) covering any technical field . If these existing technologies become publicly available (Publicly Available), then what other invention Can creation be authorized?
This is where ChatGPT can directly lead to the subversion and destruction of the patent industry!
It's not happening now because ChatGPT has not been "rigged" for that purpose! (Temporarily click here for this purpose, more content will not be expanded...you can observe, discuss and make decisions from multiple dimensions)
Welcome to exchange and discuss:
Email: bin firstname.lastname@example.org